- Helicon focus vs photoshop cs6 windows 10#
- Helicon focus vs photoshop cs6 software#
- Helicon focus vs photoshop cs6 series#
"I would assume that both images have been produced by processing the set of 4 images through Helicon focus and then repeating the same process through Affinity Photo's Focus Merge to make a comparison but which image belongs to which processing?" "It would also help if you could explain what you mean by "crop and resize." Are you talking about resampling the images or something else? "Ĭrop and resize means I took the full-sized output of the 7360x4912 px inputs and cropped it to show the relevant area, then resized it so it wouldn't be overly large when I stuck it in the forum entry. The files are 799.jpg, 800.jpg, 801.jpg, 802.jpg and affinity.tiff
I have no idea whether or not you'll be able to download them, but they're on my website at I ran a new set, which may have been the same ones from the original post and placed them on my website.
Helicon focus vs photoshop cs6 series#
I was processing a bunch of series of images, and don't know which one I used for the original post.
Helicon focus vs photoshop cs6 software#
The only variable is which software did the processing. Yes, in some cases they can, but since they only appear in "a", I believe they're not the result of a problem with the input images. Could you post a link to the four original images? " " Certainy halos such as you show can be an artefact of focus merging, but I think we need more information. The halos in the image on the left do not appear in the image on the right. The images below them are close-up views of the images above. "a" and "f" are the outputs of those two processes. Is there some setting or set of settings I can/should be using to improve the output quality of the Focus Merge?Īs the original entry said, I ran a set of 4 images through Affinity Photo and Helicon focus. I'm using the Focus Merge (or image stacking) to create the raw material for further optimization in Lightroom and Photoshop, so I want the sharpest, cleanest output from the stack processing to start with.įrom my examination "a" isn't as sharp and has more "haloing" (or whatever you'd call that smear on the edges in the close-up images). The next images are a close-up of an area with "a" on the left and "f" on the right Image "a" is on the left and "f" on the right Only thing done was to crop and resize down to a reasonable size.
No processing was done on any of the images before, or after, the image stack processing, so these are as close to un-messed-with as possible. These were taken outside on a "windless" morning, so there may be very small differences in position between shots. I took a simple, 4-shot series of full-sized jpegs, captured with a Nikon D810 using Helicon Remote so the intervals are consistent, and processed it through Helicon and Affinity Photo. To some extent because I'm hoping for a better tool than Helicon Focus for doing stack processing. I bought Affinity Photo when it went on sale. Current version (as of last Friday) of Affinity Photo.
Helicon focus vs photoshop cs6 windows 10#
Windows PC, Windows 10 Pro, GTX 970, 5820 running at 4.5GHz, 32GB of DDR4 memory.
0 kommentar(er)
